Sunday, May 17, 2009

TRANSPARENCY UNMASKED

Obama Bars Access To His Records from Obama Files 
On his first day in office, January 21, 2009, Obama signed Executive Order 13489. This order was entered into the Federal Register on January 26, 2009. 

What this executive order says, is that only the Attorney General (Eric Holder) and Council to the President, (Gregory Craig) are able to review presidential records requests and determine if they can be made public or not. (See Section 3) 
In other words, you aren't going to see any records or documents that Obama doesn't want you to see. 
It shouldn't surprise anyone that Obama's first official act was to deny access to his records. Obama has lived for 48 years without leaving any footprints -- none! There is no Obama documentation -- no bona fides -- no paper trail -- nothing. 

Original, vault copy birth certificate -- Not released -- Lawyers fees -- greater than $1,000,000 -- birth certificate -- $15. 
Certificate of Live Birth -- Released -- Counterfeit 
Obama/Dunham marriage license -- Not released 

Obama/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators) 

Kindergarten records -- Records lost 
Soetoro/Dunham marriage license -- Not released 
Soetoro adoption records -- Not released 

Soetoro/Dunham divorce -- Released (by independent investigators) 
Fransiskus Assisi School School application -- Released (by independent investigators) 
Punahou School records -- Not released 
Selective Service Registration -- Released -- Counterfeit 
Occidental College records -- Not released 
Passport -- Not released and records scrubbed clean by Obama's terrorism and intelligence adviser. 
Columbia College records -- Not released 
Columbia thesis -- Not released 
Harvard College records -- Not released 
Harvard Law Review articles -- None 

Illinois Bar Records -- Not released. 
Baptism certificate -- None 
Medical records -- Not released 
Illinois State Senate records -- None 
Illinois State Senate schedule -- Lost 
Law practice client list -- Not released 
University of Chicago scholarly articles -- None 
Go ahead, tell me that this is just a coincidence.

No comments: