Monday, December 31, 2007

Religious Discrimination in America:

Woman Escorted Off Bus For Reading Bible Aloud
What if it were the Koran? Oh....we'd be tolerant!
Huckabee Stands by 'Christ' Comment...
Good for him! Anyone with a modicum of understanding knows that forced religion (or forced non-religion) is no way run a country. You are saved by grace through faith. Protestants understand this and know it to mean that it is by freewill that one comes to repentance. This is the only way to "take a nation back"--not by government. Anyone who thinks that Huckabee doesn't understand this must be a Christaphobe.

Friday, December 28, 2007


Hillary STILL not taking any questions....Dem's need to start telling us what they will do in office and what they would do under certain situations. What's behind door number three? A person who claims she has experience. That's all we know.

Romney Record on Mass. Marriage Decision Challenged

Beijing air pollution 'as bad as it can get'...

French scientist calls Gore a 'crook' and his followers 'religious zealots'...

Tuesday, December 25, 2007

CLEAR EXPLANATION OF TAX CUTS

Sometimes politicians, journalists and others exclaim; "It's just a taxcut for the rich!" and it is just accepted to be fact, withoutquestioning it. But what does that really mean?Just in case you are not completely clear on this issue, the followingmight help. Let's put tax cuts in terms everyone can understand.Suppose that every day, ten men go out for beer and the bill for allten comes to $100. If they paid their bill the way we pay our taxes, it would go something like this:The first four men (the poorest) would pay nothing.The fifth would pay $1.The sixth would pay $3.The seventh would pay $7.The eighth would pay $12.The ninth would pay $18.The tenth man (the richest) would pay $59.So, that's what they decided to do.The ten men drank in the bar every day and seemed quite happy with thearrangement, until one day, the owner threw them a curve. "Since youare all such good customers," he said, "I'm going to reduce the cost ofyour daily beer by $20. "Drinks for the ten now cost just $80.The group still wanted to pay their bill the way we pay our taxes sothe first four men were unaffected. They would still drink for free.What about the other six men, those paying the tab? How could theydivide the $20 windfall so that everyone would get his 'fair share?'They realized that $20 divided by six is $3.33. But if they subtractedthat from everybody's share, then the fifth man and the sixth man wouldeach end up being paid to drink his beer. So, the bar owner suggestedthat it would be fair to reduce each man's bill by roughly the sameamount, and he proceeded to work out the amounts each should pay.And so:
The fifth man, like the first four, now paid nothing (100% savings).The sixth now paid $2 instead of $3 (33% savings).The seventh now pay $5 instead of $7 (28% savings).The eighth now paid $9 instead of $12 (25% savings).The ninth now paid $14 instead of $18 (22% savings).The tenth now paid $49 instead of $59 (16% savings).Each of the six was better off than before. And the first fourcontinued to drink for free. But once outside the restaurant, the menbegan to compare their savings. "I only got a dollar out of the20, "declared the sixth man.
He pointed to the tenth man," but he got $10!"
"Yeah, that's right," exclaimed the fifth man. "I only saved a dollar, too. It's unfair that he got ten times more than I!"
"That's true!!" shouted the seventh man. "Why should he get $10 back when I got only two? The wealthy get all the breaks!"
"Wait a minute," yelled the first four men in unison. "We didn't get anything at all. The system exploits the poor!"The nine men surrounded the tenth and beat him up.
The next night the tenth man didn't show up for drinks, so the nine satdown and had beers without him. But when it came time to pay the bill,they discovered something important. They didn't have enough moneybetween all of them for even half of the bill!And that, boys and girls, journalists and college professors, is howour tax system works. The people who pay the highest taxes get the mostbenefit from a tax reduction. Tax them too much, attack them for beingwealthy, and they just may not show up anymore. In fact, they mightstart drinking overseas where the atmosphere is somewhat friendlier.

Merry Christmas!

Friday, December 21, 2007

The New Spanish Inquisition?

Gore Lashes Out...
Several scientists in the report said many colleagues share their skepticism about man-made climate change but don't speak out publicly for fear of retribution, according to the report.
"Many of my colleagues with whom I spoke share these views and report on their inability to publish their skepticism in the scientific or public media," atmospheric scientist Nathan Paldor, professor of Dynamical Meteorology and Physical Oceanography at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, said in the report.

Thursday, December 20, 2007

Over 400 Prominent Scientists Disputed Man-Made Global Warming Claims in 2007

Senate Report Debunks "Consensus" Complete U.S. Senate Report Now Available: (LINK)
Complete Report w/out Intro: (LINK)
INTRODUCTION:
Over 400 prominent scientists from more than two dozen countries recently voiced significant objections to major aspects of the so-called "consensus" on man-made global warming. These scientists, many of whom are current and former participants in the UN IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change), criticized the climate claims made by the UN IPCC and former Vice President Al Gore.

Wednesday, December 19, 2007

Record low temperatures being set all over the world...

PUTIN NAMED TIME'S 'PERSON OF THE YEAR'...

RUNNERS-UP: GORE, ROWLING, PETRAEUS...

Romney Calls Choice 'Disgusting'...

McCain sees 'KGB' in Putin's eyes; Says Petraeus Should Have Won...
in fact, most people agree, Petraeus should have been.
Previous Winners:

1927

Charles Augustus Lindbergh

1928

Walter P. Chrysler

1929

Owen D. Young

1930

Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi

1931

Pierre Laval

1932

Franklin Delano Roosevelt

1933

Hugh Samuel Johnson

1934

Franklin Delano Roosevelt

1935

Haile Selassie

1936

Mrs. Wallis Warfield Simpson

1937

Generalissimo & Mme Chiang Kai-Shek

1938

Adolf Hitler

1939

Joseph Stalin

1940

Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill

1941

Franklin Delano Roosevelt

1942

Joseph Stalin

1943

George Catlett Marshall

1944

Dwight David Eisenhower

1945

Harry Truman

1946

James F. Byrnes

1947

George Catlett Marshall

1948

Harry Truman

1949

Winston Leonard Spencer Churchill

1950

American Fighting-Man

1951

Mohammed Mossadegh

1952

Elizabeth II

1953

Konrad Adenauer

1954

John Foster Dulles

1955

Harlow Herbert Curtice

1956

Hungarian Freedom Fighter

1957

Nikita Krushchev

1958

Charles De Gaulle

1959

Dwight David Eisenhower

1960

U.S. Scientists

1961

John Fitzgerald Kennedy

1962

Pope John XXIII

1963

Martin Luther King Jr.

1964

Lyndon B. Johnson

1965

General William Childs Westmoreland

1966

Twenty-Five and Under

1967

Lyndon B. Johnson

1968

Astronauts Anders, Borman and Lovell

1969

The Middle Americans

1970

Willy Brandt

1971

Richard Milhous Nixon

1972

Nixon and Kissinger

1973

John J. Sirica

1974

King Faisal

1975

American Women

1976

Jimmy Carter

1977

Anwar Sadat

1978

Teng Hsiao-P'ing

1979

Ayatullah Khomeini

1980

Ronald Reagan

1981

Lech Walesa

1982

The Computer

1983

Ronald Regan & Yuri Andropov

1984

Peter Ueberroth

1985

Deng Xiaoping

1986

Corazon Aquino

1987

Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev

1988

Endangered Earth

1989

Mikhail Sergeyevich Gorbachev

1990

The Two George Bushes

1991

Ted Turner

1992

Bill Clinton

1993

The Peacemakers

1994

Pope John Paul II

1995

Newt Gingrich

1996

Dr. David Ho

1997

Andy Grove

1998

Bill Clinton and Kenneth Starr

1999

Jeff Bezos

2000

George W. Bush

2001

Rudolph Giuliani

2002

The Whistleblowers

2003

The American Soldier

2004

George W. Bush

2005

Bill Gates, Melinda Gates, & Bono

2006

You






Thursday, December 13, 2007

But...He's Right!!!

Mike Huckabee apologized to Mitt Romney on Wednesday for saying, "Don't Mormons believe that Jesus and the devil are brothers?"
Mormonism teaches that Jesus and Lucifer are brothers who competed for the opportunity to become the savior of planet earth. Jesus' plan won approval and Lucifer rebelled and became the tempter and deceiver of planet Earth.President Spencer W. Kimball wrote" "Long before you were born a program was developed by your creators ... The principal personalities in this great drama were a Father Elohim, perfect in wisdom, judgment, and person, and two sons, Lucifer and Jehovah." (Teachings of Spencer W. Kimball, p. 32-33). James Talmage explains who Jehovah is: "Jesus Christ was Jehovah...Jesus Christ, who is the Jehovah of the Old Testament" (Doctrines of Salvation, vol.1, p.11,27).Milton R. Hunter (one of the LDS General Authorities) explains "The appointment of Jesus to be Savior of the world was contested by one of the other sons of God. He was called Lucifer…this spirit-brother of Jesus desperately tried to become the Savior of mankind" (The Gospel Through the Ages, p.15, 1945).Joseph Smith stated: "The contention in heaven was...Jesus said there would be certain souls that would not be saved; and the Devil said he could save them all, and laid his plans before the grand council, who gave their vote in favour of Jesus Christ. So the Devil rose up in rebellion against God, and was cast down" (Journal of Discourses, vol. 6, p. 8)."And Satan came among them, saying: I am also a son of God" (Pearl of Great Price, Moses 5:17). See also Mormon Doctrine, pp.192, 546-47, 589-90 and Gospel Principles p.15-16.Mormonism teaches that Jesus is only one of many saviors who are each responsible for the salvation of the population of other planets like Earth. Mormon men are working with the promise that they, too, will eventually become gods and be given a planet of their own to populate. This will be accomplished by their intercourse with many wives who will bear millions of spirit children to inhabit the bodies of the people on their planet.
Just as the Muslims believe that the old Testament is scripture, they look to the Quran as their holy book. Same with the Mormons. They believe the bible is holy, "in so far as it is translated correctly," and only their church leaders can say which parts are translated correctly. If any part of the bible goes against the book of Mormon, that portion of the bible is thrown out. I've seen bishops black out portions of the bible for teenagers that they believe were not translated correctly. And, their early leaders DID teach that Satan and Jesus were brothers, that Adam was a god, and that temple mormons can still marry multiple times for heavenly purposes, but only have one earthly wife. What scares me about electing a mormon who uses the bible to answer questions when asked about Mormonism is that he doesn't take the time to do true research on his own religion, but follows it blindly, like so many 8 year olds I've personally seen stand up and give "testimony" that Joseph Smith was a prophet of god, when at 8, NO ONE can give testimony based on personal conviction. What scares me about electing a Mormon president who doesn't use his own scripture, the Book of Mormon, to answer questions when asked about his religion is that he'll answer questions and tell people what he thinks they want to hear, use their words and not his own, and pull the wool over people's eyes by not researching a question thoroughly enough and with enough historical accuracy that it can't be proven incorrect. Any man who would not know enough about his own religion to answer that "although it is true that the Doctrine of Covenants shows that the belief that Jesus and Satan were brothers was taught by early leaders of the church, we do not teach that or believe that now. All religions have man made errors, but we have an error free God," is just spouting what he's been told to say since a young age, without taking the time to make sure what he's saying is correct. In the case of Mormonism, religion has everything to do with the decision to elect a Mormon president or not. Their religion isn't just what they do on Sunday, it's who they are, all the way down to their temple garments. So, yes, Huckabee was correct. They have taught that in the past. That's the answer that should have been given, not the "dig myself out of a hole" answer that was given. That answer shows forethought and the ability to lie and hide the truth instead of being truthful and honest, and believe me, Mormonism is not about being open, honest and truthful... just try going into the temple without being a temple Mormon, you won't make it to the door. Why all the secrets? Haven't we as a country had ENOUGH secrets?

Muslim saves Jews from 'Merry Christmas' thugs Shouting match of seasonal greetings turns violent on NYC subway --New York Daily News

Dems: Amen to Ramadan, but forget about Christmas9 House members praise Islamic faith, won't recognize Christian observance....

Only weeks after voting for a resolution that "recognizes the Islamic faith as one of the great religions of the world," nine Democrats in the U.S. House refused to vote for a Christmas resolution that condemns the worldwide persecution of Christians. ...The Christmas resolution, like the Ramadan resolution, decried the violence that targets religion around the world...."Amazingly, all but two of the representatives who answered "present" or voted against the Christmas resolution voted in favor of a resolution recognizing Ramadan, even though much of the language was similar," the group said...."Notice that the Christmas resolution uses similar language. It is astonishing that those who supported the Ramadan Resolution would vote against the Christmas Resolution," Liberty Counsel said...."It astounds me that any member of Congress would oppose legislation that recognizes the important of Christmas in our country, particularly in light of the fact that earlier this year Congress passed two separate resolutions honoring the Hindu and Islamic religions…"

Monday, December 10, 2007

"I thought it would be wrong for me to rob her of the chance to be what I thought she should be," said Bill Clinton of Hillary Rodham. "She laughed and said, 'First I love you and, second, I'm not going to run for anything, I'm too hardheaded.'"

Brent Bozell: Media Blatantly Cover for Clintons

Can identity politics get any more ridiculous? In trying to establish cred with minorities, civil rights leader Andrew Young says what could be nominated for the most ridiculous quote this electoral season:
In a media interview posted online, Young also quipped that Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton has her husband behind her, and that "Bill is every bit as black as Barack."
"He's probably gone with more black women than Barack," Young said of former President Clinton, drawing laughter from a live television audience. Young, 75, was quick to follow his comment on Bill Clinton with the disclaimer, "I'm clowning."Are you kidding me?

Pelosi Briefed On Waterboarding In 2002, No Objections

The Paygo Farce Democrats admit it was all a big confidence game.

Did Iran really halt nukes? Analysts suspect ploy to stop Bush action against Tehran

Israeli minister: 'US ignoring Iran threat like it did Auschwitz'...
Israel: Forget U.S. intel, Iran nukes at full speed Official cites 'incriminating information,' rips American report as 'politically charged'

Ann Coulter Wins Voter Complaint Issue

New Study Explodes Human-Global Warming Story

Jorge CastaƱeda, Mexico's former foreign minister, writes in Newsweek online that Hugo Chavez attrempted to overturn the vote on his dictator-for-life constitutional "reforms" in Venezuela.
And further goes on to say that only when the military threatened a coup, did he back down and insist that the margin of defeat be reduced in order to save face and to be made to appear as a magnaminous democrat in the eyes of the world.

Sunday, December 09, 2007


Billarry!!!!!!!!!!!! Suuuuuuuup?!
What's that book you say?
The Communist Manifesto?!

Wednesday, December 05, 2007

As many recognize, the latest NIE on Iran’s nuclear weapons program directly contradicts what the U.S. Intelligence Community was saying just two years previously. And it appears that this about-face was very recent. How recent?
Consider that on July 11, 2007, roughly four or so months prior to the most recent NIE’s publication, Deputy Director of Analysis Thomas Fingar gave the following testimony before the House Armed Services Committee (emphasis added):
Iran and North Korea are the states of most concern to us. The United States’ concerns about Iran are shared by many nations, including many of Iran’s neighbors. Iran is continuing to pursue uranium enrichment and has shown more interest in protracting negotiations and working to delay and diminish the impact of UNSC sanctions than in reaching an acceptable diplomatic solution. We assess that Tehran is determined to develop nuclear weapons--despite its international obligations and international pressure. This is a grave concern to the other countries in the region whose security would be threatened should Iran acquire nuclear weapons.
The authors are known to outright oppose Pres Bush's policies, and now all of a sudden, we are to believe the intelligence? Without questioning? Clinton says we must now return to diplomancy. Diplomacy for what? If they aren't doing anything, what do we need to engage in diplomacy for? I gues even Ahmadinejad himself is a liar and the report knows stuff that even he doesn't. I mean, he's admitted developing enriched uranium, what else do you need? Is the world insane? Can it be convinced of anything in the name of anti-Bush?
WSJ Questions CIA Iran Flip Flop
Besides, if the NIE report is right, then it was "Shock & Awe" that was the deciding factor for Iran. Nothing else.

Hundreds of safety violations documented for Mexican rigs 'Clear double standard' subs foreign limits for U.S. laws

Green disinformation stunt fools media--NOT HARD TO DO!!!!

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

More confirmation that you can't bury the truth forever. Previous studies done years ago were buried for the sake of the pro-death crowd. It seems the right to kill a human being that hasn't had a chance to commit a misdemeanor, let alone a crime punishable by death, is more important than even the health of the women they are pretending to protect.
Study: Abortion Fueling Cancer Epidemic

Saturday, December 01, 2007

Health Care

Hillary Clinton's top advisers say she'll consider garnishing the wages of people who fail to enroll in her mandatory health insurance plan.

It's In The Koran by Patrickhenrysongs.com

video

Warrentless Searches

a video comment by Rush Limbaugh

read more | digg story

Bush stupid?

a pic

read more | digg story

Obsession - Radical Islam's War against the west

This is an educational video, it is about what Islam does not want the West to know until it is too late. Radical Islam wants to rule to world by the sord! Watch this and ask youself, do you still think Islam is the religion of Peace?

read more | digg story

Novak: Old pro Democrats who had been in awe of Sen. Hillary Clinton's perfect campaign believe she made her first serious blunder last Monday by indicating to CBS's Katie Couric that her election as president is inevitable.When Couric inquired "how disappointed will you be" if she does not win, Clinton replied: "Well, it will be me." "Clearly," the CBS anchor persisted, "you have considered" the "possibility of losing"? "No, I haven't," said the senator. "So you never even consider the possibility?" "I don't. I don't."

Saint Hillary is being praised again by the Associated Press for how wonderful she is because she "stayed calm" during the NH hostage thing at her headquarters.

Russian liberals protest Putin pressure before poll