Tuesday, May 24, 2005
Monday, May 23, 2005
Leaving the left
I can no longer abide the simpering voices of self-styled progressives -- people who once championed solidarity
A Rush Interview:RUSH: Yeah, exactly. How long has this piece of yours been in the works? It sounds like it didn't happen overnight.
THOMPSON: No, it did not happen overnight. And, you know, I've got -- by the way, you'll be interested to hear that I've gotten lots of response. But you know something? I have gotten a significant number of e-mails, over 200 from people in the Bay Area who describe themselves as progressives, as liberals, and even on the left, who said, "You have spoken for me. You've put words to something. Look, I still don't agree with Bush on the following issues, but I cannot abide this any longer myself," and I only gotten a handful of really negative stuff from what I call "the psychiatric wing of the party," the really crazy types. But I tell you, I don't mean to say that I'm a pied piper, I just had my ear to the ground and I'm looking to my own heart and I've been feeling this for some time. One person wrote me and said, "Gee, you know, you felt that about Ronald Reagan back in the eighties about the Soviet Union. How come it took you this long?" and I thought about it. I wrote him back and I said, "Have you ever had one of those experiences where, you know, when you take the garbage out on a Thursday morning -- they're going to pick up the garbage on a Thursday morning -- you set the garbage in a plastic bag on the inside of the door Wednesday night intending to take it out? Well, I forgot to take it out for about ten years," which is to say these thoughts had been ruminating and marinating, and truly it was a pivotal point for me. It all came together when I saw after the Iraq elections the people on Fox News and CNN, on your show and all the other, and mainstream -- you know, NBC, CBS, all of them. The people cheering for the Iraqis were conservative.
RUSH: Yeah.
THOMPSON: The people who were looking for -- spinning marvelous variety of excuses about why democracy is still likely, could very well fail, Nancy Pelosi, Lynn Woolsey, my congresswoman here in California, Ted Kennedy, so-called legitimate mainstream liberals putting forth remarkably well thought out scenarios about how it could fail, and I said, "What is going on?"
RUSH: How they wanted it to fail, Keith.
THOMPSON: Oh, wanted it to fail, absolutely correct.
RUSH: They wanted it to fail.
THOMPSON: They needed it because they need -- the line I felt strongest about was, "They wanted democracy to fail more than they loved freedom," or they wanted George Bush to fail. There's a mania. I mean, you know it well. You deal with it every day. There has not been this mania in the country against a president since Nixon, and I gotta tell you, that includes Bill Clinton. I supported Bill Clinton. He was kind of the last straw for me -- and I know he took a lot of hard-core stuff from the right, but I'll tell you, nothing like Nixon and Bush have received from the left.
RUSH: I got one minute here before I have to take a break. Where do you think the left is headed?
THOMPSON: I think it's a historical defunct dead end. I think, you know [a] scientist said, science precedes "funeral by funeral," and that's a way of saying when people who can't change don't change they die off. It sounds Machiavellian, but I think there's a new generation of young people, they read books like South Park Conservatives. They're not buying it anymore.
RUSH: Well, we'll see. It's clearly a point of view that you've written about that has not yet reached the leadership of the Democratic Party.
THOMPSON: No, I don't mean to say that. They're going to hold on, and there are some good people that call themselves liberals. When I call myself a liberal I mean it in the sense of liberal democracy. If you read Bobby Kennedy's speech in 1966 in South Africa, it reads like something you'd give or Bill Bennett would give.
RUSH: Well, the same thing with Hubert Humphrey talking about "family values" back in the sixties, and that's the thing that amazed me, and it's what your piece is really all about and that is the liberals of today-- Well, let's put it this way: JFK, were he to be alive today thinking as he thought when he was alive, would not have a home in the liberal wing of the Democratic Party. Keith, I gotta run but it's great to hear from you. A great piece, and thanks for the call.
Egyptian Christian held in mental hospital
Doctors say he'll stay there until he recants conversion from Islam
Now taking bets as to how long this tactic will take to make it to America.
Posted by The Recovering Liberal at 10:58 PM 0 comments
Labels: Iraq
Saturday, May 21, 2005
Thursday, May 19, 2005
Posted by The Recovering Liberal at 10:55 PM 0 comments
Labels: Iraq
The Real Reason the Dem's are so Afraid of Republican Judicial appointees!
Abortion and Religious beliefs. It's all about baby killing and Christaphobia.
Only 53% of Appelate Court Judges have been confirmed (far below the 85-95% average prior to George Bush's administration), leaving vacancies for almost 6 years. Senate rules have changed many times throughout our American history and NEVER has the fillibuster been used in this many with such obstructionist motives towards judicial nominations. Democrats invented the filibuster of judicial nominees in 2003, when the previous congress was in session, in order to defeat many of President Bush’s conservative nominees to the federal circuit courts. The filibuster strategy developed out of the Democrats' concern for the fact that Republicans commanded a majority in the Senate and were in a position to approve all the president's appellate-level judicial nominees. As a result of the new filibuster tactic employed by the Democrats, President Bush has had the lowest confirmation rate for such appointments in the history of the U. S. Nowhere in the Constitution does it say that Judicial appointees may be denied a up or down vote. It does say the majority vote wins and not that the minority that gets to make the rules and decisions.
Ladies and Gentlemen, witness the implosion of the liberal Democratic party.
What Revoltin' Bolten Is All About:
Don't Listen to the Left: It's Not About Bolton
by David Limbaugh
Posted May 19, 2005
Sen. Joe Biden, in his laborious monologue to the Senate Foreign Relations Committee concerning the appointment of John Bolton as ambassador to the United Nations last weekl, denied he and other Democrats were on a witchhunt against Bolton. Granted. The fight isn't about Bolton but President Bush. Their primary purpose is not to smear Bolton, though that's a sacrifice they're willing to make; it's to thwart the president's foreign policy, with which they radically disagree. It's to prevent him from exercising his constitutional authority to appoint qualified and respectable individuals to represent him in various departments of government.
Would someone please tell the Democrats they lost the 2004 elections and they'll have another shot in 2006 and again in 2008? I'm doubtful Republican officeholders are going to tell them, much less show them.
Bolton Accuser - Anti Bush Activist Who Committed Plagiarism
The news media and Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee have been despicable in their anti-John Bolton smear campaign.What they've not reported to you is that the highly touted Bolton critic, Melody Townsel - who accused Bolton of 'acting like a madman' and chasing her through the halls of a Russian hotel - was an anti-Bush activist (she founded the Dallas Chapter of "Mothers Opposing Bush") who has been discredited by her superiors and forced to come forward to admit that she committed plagiarism when serving as a journalist.
The Rev. Al Sharpton blasted Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean on Tuesday, saying that under his leadership, African-Americans have been excluded from top Democratic Party positions.
Group admits giving out 'gay' sex book
High schoolers received 'hard-core porn' homosexual 'how-to'
Doesn't Anyone Else See the EVIL in this Practice?
Labor and delivery
ABORTION: A gruesome Florida abortion saga reveals sordid—and possibly illegal—practices in late-term procedures | by Lynn Vincent
Posted by The Recovering Liberal at 10:43 PM 0 comments
Saturday, May 14, 2005
MEDIA MATTERSNewspaper promisesto keep liberal slantSt. Louis Post-Dispatch purchase pactrequires 5-year pledge to political agenda
Posted: May 14, 20051:25 p.m. Eastern
QUEERLY BELOVEDFamily groups decrysame-sex ruling'Arrogant' Nebraska judge strikes down marriage amendment
Posted by The Recovering Liberal at 4:35 PM 0 comments
Mexican President Vicente Fox is a racist and for breaking US laws
MEXICO CITY (Reuters) - Mexican President Vicente Fox called recent U.S. measures to stem illegal immigration a step back for bilateral relations on Friday and said Mexican migrants do jobs "that not even blacks want to do."
Posted by The Recovering Liberal at 4:10 PM 0 comments
Friday, May 06, 2005
Posted by The Recovering Liberal at 9:11 AM 0 comments
Labels: Iraq
Thursday, May 05, 2005
Google trying to patent news ranking by quality
If it works anything like Googles way of deciding which advertisers to use, Dan Rather will be the Pope soon, Soros will be Mother Theresa's replacement, and Michael Moore will be the called Jesus Christ.
Posted by The Recovering Liberal at 6:53 PM 0 comments
Coulter's F-bomber a future journalist?Student heckler wrote for college paper, Ann rips liberals who throw food, curse Will they ever admit it? Naw........
Posted by The Recovering Liberal at 6:43 PM 0 comments
Wednesday, May 04, 2005
Tuesday, May 03, 2005
The Luckiest Guy Alive!!!!!
Progress fuels hope for recovery of brain-damaged firefighterWakes up after 10 year Coma.
Pro-death crowd regrets not acting sooner.
Being a loner reduces immunity and heart health
Judge rules teen in state custody can have abortion
Doesn't say whether the teen wants it or not. I wouldn't be surprised either way.
"It is not permitted for a woman who believes in Allah to forsake (her husband's) bed," it says.
"As to those women on whose part you fear ill-conduct, admonish them (first), (next), refuse to share their beds, (and last) beat them (lightly, if it is useful)".
Posted by The Recovering Liberal at 7:42 AM 0 comments