The Ad 

The Lodge 

Whiskey Ridge Lodge 

Whiskey Ridge front yard. Missouri Breaks and river. 

backyard 

back to dad's 

26 inch spread 

profile 

The Sore-Loser Party
Understanding Smiley, Dowd, Raines, Krugman, Maher, Sarandon, et al.

European Union leaders on Thursday considered taking on a bigger role in rebuilding Iraq and forging stronger ties with re-elected President Bush.

Another "by county" 

Interesting animated graphics for the picture above

Man distraught over Bush win commits suicide
Travels from Georgia to New York to shoot self at Ground Zero

Gospels tell of true Jesus, says Canadian scholar

Joe Woodard

Calgary Herald

Saturday, November 06, 2004

Doh! 

Need I say more? 

This says more about liberals and why they will NEVER understand values (and consequently continue to fail to regain power) than anything I've read to date. Unbelievable!!!!!!! Click link below to read on.

Bloggers on the liberal Democratic Underground website have overwhelmingly labeled Nov. 3, 2004, the day after Election Day, "more depressing" than Sept. 11, 2001 in a poll of online members.

Seventy-two percent of poll takers said they believed the day Sen. John Kerry (D-Mass.) conceded defeat in the presidential election was more tragic than the day more than 3,000 Americans were killed in the attacks on the World Trade Center in New York, the Pentagon in Washington, D.C., and on a hijacked plane that crashed in a Pennsylvania field.

Americans Flock to Canada's Immigration Web Site

Do it!!!!!!!! Leave!!!! Sneak across the border like a terrorist if you have to, just GO!!!

Ya gotta love The Arnold! Now he calls CA state dem's "losers!" It is like a breath of fresh air listening to those "losers" whine and gasp! lol

But make sure that you don't get so absorbed and exhausted in taking care of all your day-by-day obligations that you lose track of the time and doze off, oblivious to God. The night is about over, dawn is about to break. Be up and awake to what God is doing! God is putting the finishing touches on the salvation work he began when we first believed. We can't afford to waste a minute, must not squander these precious daylight hours in frivolity and indulgence, in sleeping around and dissipation, in bickering and grabbing everything in sight. Get out of bed and get dressed! Don't loiter and linger, waiting until the very last minute. Dress yourselves in Christ, and be up and about!

Romans 13: 11-14
(The Bible)

The Current Crisis
The Wages of Hatred

By R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr.
Published 11/4/2004 12:06:58 AM


WASHINGTON -- For the most perceptive insight into George W. Bush
and the Republicans' robust victory over Senator Jean-François Kerry
and the Democrats, look to Tom Wolfe. As usual America's finest
living writer sees America with limpid clarity. In a pre-election
interview with the British newspaper The Guardian Wolfe observes
that the eastern media elite "do not have a clue about the rest of
the United States. You are considered twisted and retarded if you
support Bush in this election." Well, a record 59 million voters did
support Bush. "I have never come across a candidate who is so
reviled," Wolfe continues, "Reagan was sniggered at, but this is
personal, real hatred."

As always in matters where intellect should preside, the liberals
became emotionally involved, losing what little political sense they
still had. They diabolized a perfectly agreeable gentleman, whose
major fault is that he disagrees with them. At the same time they
overlooked the glum fact that their latest political messiah is a
perfectly dreadful candidate, whom they plucked from a field of
perfectly dreadful candidates. If the Republicans ran such a
ludicrous fantasist as the snooty football-throwing, bicycling
Renaissance man, Senator Kerry, everyone in the world would be made
aware of his shortcomings. As it was, the Democrats and their
secretarial staff at CBS, the New York Times and elsewhere in the
media ignored Kerry's every botch and every flight into bizarre
pretentiousness. Thus they still cannot understand how the President
won.

Kerry's basic shortcoming was that, being a fantasist, he was
forever taking implausible positions and saying things that were
demonstrably untrue. That gave the American electorate an uneasy
feeling about this boastful aspirant to the White House. His liberal
supporters saw nothing amiss with his b.s.-ing. Apparently they did
not think it mattered whether "foreign leaders," as Kerry
bragged, "look at you and say 'You gotta beat this guy.'" Nor did it
matter to liberals when in debate Kerry b.s.-ed that "I went to meet
with the members of the Security Council in the week before we
voted. I went to New York. I talked to all of them, to find out how
serious they were about really holding Saddam Hussein accountable."

Aloft in his egotistic fantasy Kerry did not believe in anything
real, not the war in Iraq nor even the contrariness and corruption
of the United Nation. This explains why Kerry made more fantastical
statements about his opponent, his own policies, and his own résumé
than any presidential candidate I can recall, including Bill
Clinton. At some point I think the American people caught on. They
recognized this man as a fraud.

The President on the other hand is obviously genuine. He is
committed to waging war against our enemies. He has given the United
Nations a chance to cooperate, but he is not going to tie us to its
endless dithering. When the Massachusetts Braggart rumbled that
President Bush "deceived us" on going to war with Iraq, the charge
did not stick. The electorate realized that the evidence did not
support the charge. The world is better off with Saddam in a cell.
Our enemies in the Middle East and elsewhere now know that to strike
a blow against America is to hazard destruction.

For me most of Senator Jean-François Kerry's extravagances were
amusing, but there was one that was shameful and unforgivable. He
took a war that had national support and politicized it. He made it
difficult for Democrats to support the war. Worse still, in
rendering the war controversial he gave aid and comfort to our
enemies. This is not the first time he gave aid and comfort to our
enemies. The Swift Boat Veterans made it clear Kerry did the same
thing thirty-five years ago. That Kerry tried to focus our attention
on his performance all those years ago is but more evidence that he
lives in a fantasy, and, by the way, has manifestly bad judgment.

Now that he has been defeated the liberals are going to try to
figure it all out. Some will say that obviously they have to reach
out to other geographical regions in the country. Maybe they will
even catch on that what the rest of the country considers moral
issues are genuine. But there is another matter they might
investigate. Why is it that so few of their presidential candidates
are normal? Why are so many fantasists with egregious lapses in
their résumés? In 1992 the nominated a draft dodger. In 2004 their
so-called war hero was actually a war resister. In the last days of
the campaign researchers dredged up the evidence that this war hero
did not even get an honorable discharge from the service. Democrats
had better look harder for heroes.

Jon Stewart is SOOO sad!!!!!!!!!!!!

Moral Values Propelled Bush to Re-election
The Immoral cry foul.

Sen. Dodd: We Democrats Are out of Touch
Duhhh!!!!!! At least ONE liberal recognizes it.

NOW they want to play nice!
Europe Seeks New Beginning With Bush

Putin says Bush win means U.S. not scared of terror

Question: Who's going to be the first liberal to call for Bush's impeachment?

They've proven that they don't learn. "It's always someone elses's fault," they say. It can't be that they have lsot touch with the mainstream. If half the liberals knew how lied to they are on a daily basis by the very people they support, they'd leave the party too.

I fully expect the liberals to begin even more viscious attacks. just wait and see how bad they say things are. It will be a miserable environment to live in. Constant complaining and doomsday speak. Then ask why Kerry hadn't put forth this new "evidence" of how Bush is destroying the universe. The answer: It's STILL a lie, you sore losers! Look in the mirror!

The breakdown by county. I hate that we have red, but love the coverage. Don't you? 

The Mandate:

The greatest number of popular votes of any presidential candidate in history;
Largest Rep. block in the Senate since the 1920's;
The first president to be re-elected AND gain seats in the house and senate since 1936;
The first time the party has achieved 12 consecutive years in power in the chamber since the dozen years that ended in January 1933;

Voters in 11 States Reject Gay Marriage

Canadian officials made clear on Wednesday that any U.S. citizens so fed up with Bush that they want to make a fresh start up north would have to stand in line like any other would-be immigrants -- a wait that can take up to a year.

Soggy-Sogby Zogby REALLY screwed up last night. Bye-bye Zog boy! You're sunk now.

"Vote-Or-Die" crowd must have died before reaching the pollong booths......

Stocks Soar

Katherine Harris re-elected to House

Exit polls be damned! Bush wins with OVER 50% of the popular vote. Apparently the network news consotium that funded and ran the exit polls failed in their last ditch attempt to energize their base.

I would like to thank Gavin Newsom for the illegal gay marriages which caused the sleeping giant to wake up. Were it not for so many states having a referendum on the definition of Marriage, Bush may have lost.

Also, our soldiers and their families showed HUGE support for the president. And a big thanks goes out to the Swift Vets for exposing Kerry's dishonor.

'Stolen Honor' Steals the Show

When Kerry and his allies threatened to take Sinclair Broadcast Group’s FCC licenses if the network aired the documentary “Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal,” they were telegraphing to the world how much they feared the American people might see it.

This documentary by the courageous award-winning journalist Carlton Sherwood was not political propaganda as its detractors said. It was a factual account of what Kerry did during his anti-war days – and how that behavior affected American POWs and the war.

Though under incredible pressure from every angle, from everything the Kerry campaign could throw at it, Sinclair did air a few minutes of the 43-minute documentary as part of a program. But the American public was deprived of most of the information in the documentary.

At that point NewsMax stepped into the breach. We decided that the public’s right to know overrode the intimidation tactics of the P.C. thought police.

In the end, NewsMax decided to air “Stolen Honor.” Last weekend, we aired the documentary several dozen times across the nation, including 10 showings on PAX-TV alone. PAX reaches almost 100 million American homes. We estimate that more than 5 million Americans saw “Stolen Honor.”

Apparently, the young MTV crowd forgot to show up at the polls. They must have been too busy downloading new ring tones for their cell phones.

I'm watching CBS News tonight. I think Dan Rather is going to cry.

So Bush can continue to take it out on the enemy. Follwing in the great tradition of Ronald Reagan, pursuing and defeating our enemy while facing opposition from sceptics at home, I have no doubt he will be successful.

Dem's, relax. It'll be okay. Despite what Kerry says, the sky IS NOT falling.

p.s. bye bye Daschle and good ridance

George Soros Loses! Richest Senator in Washington weighs option to steal the election through the courts.

A short voters guide to the Iraq War
Exclusive: Bob Just reveals stunning implications of current conflict

Cronkite: Bush working with bin Laden
Says he thinks Rove set up videotape terror threat

Bush ad goes funny with 'Naked Gun' director
David Zucker: 'I was really a liberal Democrat until 9-11'

“The most devastatingly funny TV ad
of the season!”

Quicktime Link


Cronkite: Bush working with bin Laden
Says he thinks Rove set up videotape terror threat What a joke these "anchormen" are

Green indoctrination
on Kerry's agenda?
Candidate founded group to shift
children's 'thinking, values, action'

Study finds press pro-Kerry

Schwarzkopf: DNC making fraudulent phone calls
Dems claim he's endorsing Kerry, but general supports Bush
--Associated Press

Cronkite: Bush working with bin LadenSays he thinks Rove set up videotape terror threat. Crazy people we all "trust"

'Missing Explosives' Story Has Kerry Camp on Defensive

Story Shows Saddam's Weapons Were Real - and There


Saddam Had 'Highly Dangerous, Easily Moved' Explosives, Dem Says

The Media is at it AGAIN!!!!!!!!!!!! Bah ha ha ha ha!!!!!!!!!!
I love the internet, these guys are going to get caught more and more frequently until they actually ARE neutral.

The Vanishing Explosive Story
Kerry’s Monday talking points were weak.

EDWARDS WIFE: NO RIOTS IF WE WIN

But if she doesn't......................Watch out!!!

Bush Aide Draws Fire with Pre-Election Speech

Yet THEY are the one who established the precedent allowing Clinton to criticize a sitting president (which formerly had been out of bounds).

Syria now admits it has Saddam's money says GEOSTRATEGY-DIRECT INTELLIGENCE BRIEF. So then, where are they hiding the WMD?

Christian campus group must accept non-believers
Suing state university over 'politically correct' nondiscrimination policy
The Bible says that in the last days, "they will call good evil and evil good."

A Washington Times article this week summed up the concerns:

"A coalition of liberal groups committed to defeating President Bush has spent more than $100 million orchestrating the largest voter-registration drive in U.S. history, raising concerns of widespread voter fraud in 14 battleground states.

"At the same time, Democratic Party officials are gearing up to challenge unfavorable Election Day results in a number of states through 'pre-emptive strikes,' charging that Republicans prevented minorities from voting even before any such incidents are confirmed."

Get it? Republicans don't want black people to vote. It's a tired old horse, but the Democrats are committed to riding it to death.

Thankfully, at least some of the scams are being addressed.

In Colorado, a judge has upheld a rule that voters must show identification before voting. This is a completely logical ruling, but it is one opposed by the left. In addition, the Florida Supreme Court has ruled that people casting provisional ballots in the wrong places are not entitled to have their votes counted. Again, the left has charged that this rule – and here's that imposing word again – disenfranchises voters.

But Colorado could still be the site of major problems. You see, the Democratic National Committee's Colorado Election Day Manual has instructed state voters to initiate a "pre-emptive strike" by charging that voters faced intimidation tactics, even if proof of such tactics are non-existent.

This is the very picture of desperation politics.

Denver Post columnist David Harsanyi said this week: " Long ago, the DNC decided it was in its best interests to revive the urban myth of 2000's disenfranchisement in Florida. This despite an exhaustive investigation by the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights, led by a Democrat, that uncovered no evidence of voter intimidation, or voter harassment, or intentional or systematic disenfranchisement of black voters."

These are dangerous fun and games from the Democrats. They are so consumed with a Kerry victory (or possibly more so by a Bush loss) that they are willing to do anything to win, or even to simply prolong the election to taint a second Bush term.

In Ohio, a man was arrested this week after allegedly filling out 124 voter registration forms in exchange for a payment of crack cocaine.

When you consider the hatred for President Bush by the left, it's really not that hard to believe that trading cocaine for votes might actually happen.

Here's more: America's 1st Freedom magazine reported that new federal regulations will allow felons, fugitives, even foreign nationals to vote, with their votes subject only to post-election review by local authorities. And who will hold these local authorities accountable? Have you heard about John Kerry's 30,000-member horde of lawyers who will be monitoring polling in the battleground states?

The presence of the Kerry lawyer brigade should make us all rest easier, huh?

The publication noted: "So if you thought waiting for the outcome of the 2000 elections was like Chinese water torture, wait until John Kerry, John Edwards and their contingency-fee trial-attorney backers sink their teeth into the prospect of grabbing 3 to 6 million provisional votes."

So what's it all boil down to?

Well, it's obvious that there is treachery afoot. We must all be on the alert for potential voter fraud and report anything out of order we witness at the polls or elsewhere.

More importantly, it behooves Christians to be in heartfelt prayer for our nation. Clearly, many people have placed their own interests above our national interests in this election.

But the Bible teaches us that God honors those nations that honor Him, so we must be about the Father's business.

Kerry went hunting today.

Kerry returned after a two-hour hunting trip wearing a camouflage jacket and carrying a 12-gauge shotgun, but someone else carried the bird he said he shot.

"I'm too lazy," Kerry joked. "I'm still giddy over the Red Sox. It was hard to focus." Idiot.

In honor of all the geese Kerry and his men slaughtered today, I will be showing the film, Fly Away Home, starring Jeff Daniels.

Canadian Geese Don't Taste Good Anyway. 

Self Righteous Lib's 

TVC Condemns TN Democrat For Distributing Flyer Belittling Special Olympics Kids

For Immediate Release
October 14, 2004

Washington, DC, -- “Tennessee State Representative Craig Fitzhugh should be ashamed of himself for allowing his campaign office to distribute a flyer belittling Special Olympics children,” said Traditional Values Coalition Chairman Louis P. Sheldon, today. “This disgusting flyer is an insensitive attack against children with disabilities.”

 

Feds OK'd biblical Grand Canyon book?Special-interest group claims resource approved, Park Service denies it. Never-the-less, these sniveling idiots who can't stand up to competition ought to grow some huevos!


Mystery Surrounds Kerry's Navy Discharge

Kerry Campaign Knows They're Down, Busy Shoring Up Jewish, Black Support

Vet: Kerry Pressured Me to Lie About Atrocities

Arafat Backs Kerry; Israelis Favor Bush

Vietnamese Americans mostly ignore 'war hero' Kerry, support Bush

FCC Chair to Seek Net Telephone Oversight

"I was responsible for the operation at Tora Bora, and I can tell you that the senator's understanding of events doesn't square with reality," retired Army Gen. Tommy Franks wrote in a commentary published by The New York Times.

John Edwards LOVES his hair!!!!!!!!!!!!!

And here they are............. 

Exclusive: Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties The actual documents are linked half way down the page.

Kerry and Edwards Diss Ex-Gays

Kerry Discriminates Against Ex-Gays; He Denies Their ExistenceTo National Desk, Political ReporterContact: Regina Griggs, PFOX Executive Director, 703-360-2225, 703-405-9448 (cell)News Advisory, October 14 /Christian Wire Service/ -- An open letter to Dick and Lynn Cheney from Regina Griggs:I am saddened by the outrageous behavior of Senators Kerry and Edwards, who inexplicably and insensitively injected your daughter Mary's sexuality into the presidential debates. I am the parent of a homosexual child and the Executive Director of Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays (PFOX), a national organization that offers support and education to families and friends of homosexuals, and advocates for the rights of ex-gays.Mary is, I'm sure, a fine young woman with many wonderful qualities, and that is how she should be recognized. To label anyone solely by their sexuality is demeaning and inappropriate. As parents, we can and do love our children unconditionally no matter who they are attracted to. Loving unconditionally allows us the freedom to maintain our values and viewpoints while keeping a bridge open to our children.Senator Kerry deliberately misled the American public as well as people who have unwanted same-sex attractions when he stated that people are born gay. He should know better. On May 13, 2004, PFOX and ex-gay men and women met with the staffs of Senators Kerry and Edwards. (see photo at http://www.earnedmedia.org/edwards.htm ) The ex-gays are living proof that change is possible, and they also provided the staffs with educational information on former homosexuality, including a statement from the American Psychiatric Association that there are no "replicated scientific studies supporting any specific biological etiology for homosexuality." Ex-gays explained that although no one chooses same sex attractions, many men and women overcome unwanted same sex attractions every year.Ex-gays also presented the Senators' offices with a Congressional resolution on tolerance for former homosexuals. The resolution calls for Congress to condemn intolerance against ex-gays and to affirm its commitment to a society that respects all people, including former homosexuals. Now who could be opposed to that? Yet both Senators have refused to state whether they support the resolution.Homosexual activists like those working on the Kerry-Edwards team want "gay marriage" and civil unions in order to gain public affirmation. They think this will make them happy. Happiness requires hope, and real hope is the knowledge that many men and women overcome unwanted same-sex attractions every year, even those who believed at one time that they were born that way and had no choice. Mr. and Mrs. Cheney, let me conclude by saying that I hope you'll sit down with PFOX someday and find kindred souls and new hope that you might not have known existed.

"You can't be pro-doctor, pro-patient, pro-hospital, and pro-trial lawyer at the same time," Bush said.

Boxer Ducks Debate With Jones

ABC & France
A Thin Veil No More
by Thomas G. Del Beccaro


Kerry Taking Campaign Contributions From Pro-Iranian GroupBy Jeff GannonTalon NewsOctober 15, 2004

Baby's In A Blender Get You This: 

When did Journalism Morph into Op-Ed's?


ABC News Audio Link between Bin Laden and Iraq WMD - Kerry Wrong

Stolen Honor

The Looming Issue Neither Candidate Will Speak About

This is an issue that Bush and Kerry don't want to talk about because it touches a politically explosive subject: immigration
The census bureau's annual figures on family incomes and poverty were bound to become familiar factoids in the Bush-Kerry combat. The numbers seem to confirm what many people feel: the middle class is squeezed; poverty's worsening. In 2003 the median household income dropped for the fourth consecutive year, to $43,318; the official poverty rate rose for the third year, to 12.5 percent of the population; and the number of people without health insurance increased for the third year to 45 million, or 16 percent of the population. But the debate you're hearing is not the real deal. What ought to be the debate is shunned by both candidates because it touches a politically explosive subject: immigration.
The Census statistics are both better and worse than advertised. They're better because the middle class isn't vanishing. Many middle-class families achieved large income gains in the 1990s and-despite the recession and halting recovery-have kept those gains. They're worse because the increase in poverty in recent decades stems mainly from immigration. Until our leaders acknowledge the connection between immigration and poverty, we'll be hamstrung in dealing with either.
Let's examine the Census numbers. They certainly don't indicate that, over any reasonable period, middle-class living standards have stagnated. Mostly, the middle class is getting richer. Consider: in 2003, 44 percent of U.S. households had before-tax incomes exceeding $50,000; about 15 percent had incomes of more than $100,000 (they're also included in the 44 percent). In 1990 the comparable figures were 40 percent and 10 percent. In 1980 they were 35 percent and 6 percent. All comparisons are adjusted for inflation.
True, the median household income has dropped since 1999 and is up only slightly since 1990. That's usually taken as an indicator of what's happened to a typical family. It isn't. The median income is the midpoint of incomes; half of households are above, half below. The median household was once imagined as a family of Mom, Dad and two kids. But "typical" no longer exists. There are more singles, childless couples and retirees. Smaller households tend to have lower incomes. They drag down the overall median. So do more poor immigrant households.
A slightly better approach is to examine the incomes of households of similar sizes: all with, say, two people. In 2003 those households had a median income of $46,964, off about $900 from the peak year (1999) but up almost 10 percent from 1990. For four-person households, the median income in 2003 was $64,374, off about $2,200 from its peak but still up about 14 percent from 1990. Though unemployment and less overtime have temporarily dented incomes, the basic trend is up.
Now look at poverty. For 2003, the Census Bureau estimated that 35.9 million Americans had incomes below the poverty line; that was about $12,000 for a two-person household and $19,000 for a four-person household. Since 2000, poverty has risen among most racial and ethnic groups. Again, that's the recession and its after-math. But over longer periods, Hispanics account for most of the increase in poverty. Compared with 1990, there were actually 700,000 fewer non-Hispanic whites in poverty last year. Among blacks, the drop since 1990 is between 700,000 and 1 million, and the poverty rate-though still appallingly high-has declined from 32 percent to 24 percent. (The poverty rate measures the percentage of a group that is in poverty.) Meanwhile, the number of poor Hispanics is up by 3 million since 1990. The health-insurance story is similar. Last year 13 million Hispanics lacked insurance. They're 60 percent of the rise since 1990.
To state the obvious: not all Hispanics are immigrants, and not all immigrants are Hispanic. Still, there's no mystery here. If more poor and unskilled people enter the country-and have children-there will be more poverty. (The Census figures cover both legal and illegal immigrants; estimates of illegals range upward from 7 million.) About 33 percent of all immigrants (not just Hispanics) lack a high-school education. The rate among native-born Americans is about 13 percent. Now, this poverty may or may not be temporary. Some immigrants succeed quickly; others do not. But if the poverty persists-and is compounded by more immigration-then it will create mounting political and social problems. One possibility: a growing competition for government benefits between the poor and baby-boom retirees.
You haven't heard much in this campaign about these problems-and you won't. To raise them is to seem racist; that's a heavy burden for politicians or journalists. Politicians also risk alienating Hispanic voters. Worse, there's the hard question: what to do? President George W. Bush and various Democrats have offered immigration plans that propose different ways of legalizing today's illegal immigrants. That's fine as long as the future inflow of illegal and poorer immigrants can be controlled. That would require stiffer measures than either party has endorsed. These are tough problems; our leaders give them the silent treatment. This is understandable, but it won't make them go away.

Kerry Dissed All Italians in '97 Very Presidential-like

Stolen Honor: Wounds That Never Heal

If Kerry is President, He May Even Flip-Flop On Abortion!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

The "Liberal" Hate Campaign
By David Horowitz

Chechen Terrorists From the Mexican Border

Bodies of babies found in Saddam's 'killing field'

John Edwards Likens Kerry To Televangelist

Provisional Ballots: How to Steal an Election

U.S. Refuses to Keep Illegal Aliens From Voting

Caught: ACORN Nuts Register Voter '35 Times'

Democrat Vote Fraud in California

Democrat Election Sleaze in Alaska

Bush Asks Freedom Of Speech Party To Stop Hypocracy
Letter on Voter Intimidation to AFL-CIO President John Sweeney

Great Political Cartoons!!!!!!!!!!

Bush’s National Guard years. Before you fall for Dems’ spin, here are the facts

Eight Reasons America Is Safer Under Bush

Blogs For Bush Rocks!

Voter Fraud Alert In FLA

Iraqi Born Nashville Resident Tries To Go Jihad

THE PRESIDENT IS BACK BY DICK MORRIS

Although Pres. Bush was great at last nights debate a memo was found to be circulated at "ABC" before the debate. It said that they will hold Pres. Bush More accountable for what HE says ! Liberal Bias Once Again !!! Also , the last question of the night asked Pres.Bush to name 3 Mistakes He Made during his Presidency! It didn't ask Each Candidate to list 3 Mistakes that they Each Made !! This was saved to the end of the night to Provide Kerry a Chance to Knock Pres.Bush . The Moderator (Gibson) knew the questions andObviously Approved it . But in a 'CNN" Poll ( another Very Liberal Station) pres. Bush went from having a 7% point lead on theIssue of Terrorism to a 17 Point Lead ! He also hada lead of 50 - 46 on the Issue of Handling Iraq , butAfter the Debate his lead increased to 53 -46 . Nowthis was results from an Ultra Liberal Station . I'mcurious to see what a "FOX NEWS" Poll result willshow. Keep active - Continue Networking - Call Talk RadioShows - Write Newspaper Editors - Register NewRepublican/Conservative Voters- Don't Let Up !God Bless America - Our Troops - and pres. Bush !
It's not JUST Blather:
NBC Host Used Selective Analysis to Help Edwards Refute Cheney
CBS Again Under Fire for Questionable Reporting

Iraq Report Suggests Hussein Bribed Allies A report submitted by chief weapons inspector Charles Duelfer has added another dramatic twist to the debate over Iraq. The 1,300-page report of the CIA-led Iraqi Survey Group confirmed much of what was already known about Saddam Hussein and his weapons of mass destruction programs, but provided a few startling revelations as well.

NBC, USA Today Accused Of Sending Subliminal Anti-Bush Messages

GOP-led House Rejects Democrats' Military Draft Bill sponsored by Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY)

How John, How?

It's NO debate here! 

French Tested! 

Afghani woman VOTES! 

Noonan: Why Democrats Become Republicans

Billboard With Ex-Gay Message is Vandalized
Contact: Regina Griggs at 703-360-2225; Executive Director of
Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays; ex-gays@earthlink.net
RICHMOND, Va. Sept 29, 2004 -- At a time when homosexual activists
are seeking rights such as "gay marriage," hate crime laws, adopting
children and promoting homosexuality in schools, they are also
attacking the freedoms of the ex-gay community. A billboard on
Highway I-64 near Richmond, Virginia states: "Ex-Gays Prove That
Change Is Possible. Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays and Gays Seeking
Tolerance For All."
The billboard purchased by the group Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays
and Gays, PFOX, has now been defaced with red paint.
"We put up this billboard so that people will know the truth – that
you don't have to be homosexual if you don't want to be. We're hoping
this ad will bring about public awareness, respect and tolerance.
"The vandalism of our billboard is another example of the intolerance
ex-gays often face. We pray for those who tried to suppress our
message, and we are as determined as ever to support the right of
self-determination for those who seek help for unwanted same sex
attractions.
"We see from this attack, and numerous hateful emails we have
received from gay activists, that our message is clear, but
unsettling," -- Regina Griggs, Executive Director, PFOX
Photo of the vandalized billboard is available online at
http://www.earnedmedia.org/pfox.htm
Click on photo for a high-resolution version
Previous press release on this billboard is available online at
http://www.pfox.org/asp/newsman/templates/newstemplate.asp?
articleid=144&zoneid=7

Debate Transcript
October 8, 2004

Is this one of Saddam's
mobile bio-weapons labs?

Protestors Ransack Bush/Cheney Headquarters In Orlando and Other Places

Here's A Shocker:

Muslim group endorses Kerry



Troops in survey back Bush 4-to-1 over Kerry

"Whatever your position on Iraq, John Kerry is your man," Or How Kerry Won The Debate and Support From Both Sides of the Issue

Kerry's Presidential Promises Panning Out by Alex

Dramatis Personae: John Kerry, Jacques Chirac, Scene: Oval Office,
> at the big desk. -------------- (The President picks up a telephone
> and calls Jacques Chirac, President of France)
>
> Kerry: Hey! Jacques! Say "Bonjour" to the new King of the World!!
>
> Chirac: Congratulations mon ami. You really kicked derierre!
>
> Kerry: Yeah, well, don't forget, I was born to be the President.
> I've known it since my days as a war hero, in the jungles of Viet
> Nam. It was a hot day on the swift boat, I had just finished saving
> the lives of 40...
>
> Chirac: Ahhh...oui. Well, Jean, what can I do for you?
>
> Kerry: Well, now it's time for me to show 'em how it's done. I'm
> going to use my charm and rapport skills to build a "true"
> coalition, consisting of all the people already in the coalition,
> ahh, the one's who didn't leave after I said they were bribed and
> coerced, and France and Germany. Once we add you two to our
> coalition, changing the number from 30 to 32, that will mean that
> America is no longer doing things unilaterally.
>
> Chirac: Your math skills are miraculous, my friend.
>
> Kerry: Thanks, Jacques. Your approval means a heck of a lot to me.
> More than you know. Well, listen, here's the deal. Right now 90% of
> the cost of the war is paid for by Americans and 90% of the
> casualties are American. So my idea is that you French join us, and
> supply, say, 30-35% of the cost, and, oh, I don't know, 40% of the
> casualties? That sound fair, Jacques, old pal?
>
> Chirac: Yes, I heard you say that during your first debate,
> complaining that the percentage of Americans to die is too high,
> implying that your allies weren't dying fast enough, right before
> you promised to build a true coalition. Your ability to see the big
> picture is also miraculous, Jean.
>
> Kerry: It's only logical. How else can the percent of American
> casualties go down? I told the American people that if they elected
> me, we wouldn't be the only ones dying. So we need more of our
> coalition partners to die, so their casualty percentage goes up.
> Then ours goes down. It's simple.
>
> Chirac: Yes, Jean, I agree. Your plan is oh-so-simple.
>
> Kerry: It's not my fault we're in the wrong war in the wrong place
> at the wrong time that was a colossal blunder to do in the first
> place. A war that's increasing the number of terrorists by the hour,
> that will make anyone fighting for our side a target for terrorists
> and unpopular with the whole world. So, how about it? What'll it
> take for the French to join us in our cause? Let's parlay.
>
> Chirac: Let me see if I understand you, Jean. You are asking the me,
> the President of *France*, to send *French* soldiers to fight in the
> wrong war in the wrong place at the wrong time, one that is a
> colossal mistake, so that Americans won't be the only ones dying and
> paying. If we do this, we'll make lots of enemies, and probably have
> French civilians die in terror attacks, having made France a prime
> target. And for this honor, we'll pay 30% of 200 Billion dollar, or
> approximately $60 Billion USD?
>
> Kerry: Exactly. That's what I campaigned on, that's what I promised
> the American people, and that's what I'll deliver!
>
> (click)
>
> Kerry: Jacques? You there? Jacques?? Jacques? Hmmm. That didn't go
> quite as I thought it would. Usually my judgement in these matters
> in impeccable, unlike Bush, who thought that the French wouldn't
> join my coalition. His judgement is terrible. Maybe if I consented
> to sign onto the International Criminal Court? Then they could try
> Bush and Rumsfeld as war criminals. That would be great...... no,
> not time for that yet. Hey, you Carville, what's Gerhards number?
> Germans are logical. He'll understand my nuances for sure.
>
> (curtain)

Money trail behindKerry's Iran stanceCandidate has financial ties to backers of mullah regime Iran on Sunday rebuffed a proposal by US presidential candidate John Kerry who has suggested supplying the Islamic state with nuclear fuel How John, How? During the first Presidential debate, John Kerry suggested that the United States had incurred ninety per cent of the casualties, and ninety per cent of the cost, of the war in Iraq. Complaining that America had spent "$200 billion in Iraq" that could have been used here at home for health care, infrastructure, and relief for the poor, Kerry accused President Bush of "taking his eye off the central focus of the war on terror, Usama bin Ladin." When Kerry was pressed by moderator Jim Lehrer in the fifth question of the debate, "how would you improve homeland security", Kerry dodged. Instead of giving details of his plan for improving homeland security, he launched into a series of specious attacks against the President. His answer, from the transcripts of the debate, didn't provide a single, solitary detail of his plan. He had, during the first question of the debate, offered only the most vague and indeterminate shadow of a plan for fighting terror.

September 30, 2004Spread Democracy What to ask Joh n Kerry . by Victor Davis HansonNew York Times

The U.N.? Who Needs It . . . ?It is about time to think the unthinkable: the UN is not beneficial, neutral, but increasingly hostile to freedom.by Victor Davis HansonWall Street Journal

Gotta LOVE this guy! Right on the money.

Victor Davis Hanson, a Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford University, is lecturing during the month of September in the History Department at Hillsdale College (8/20/04—9/25/04) where he is also a teaching fellow of the college. He is offering two classes while in residence at Hillsdale: A History of the Peloponnesian War, which is a military and political account of the 27-year war, and Great Captains: Profiles in Leadership that examines 10 case studies of both successful and failed commanders, in search of characteristics of successful political and military leadership from Themistocles to Churchill.

Interesting Reads:

September 15, 2004
A Short Reflection on Anti-Americanism, the Prejudice
by Joey Tartakovsky
Private Papers

The Perfect Storm of Hating Bush
by Victor Davis Hanson
This series written for Private Papers will appear in four parts.
Part One
The new candor about killing George Bush

Part Two
Why the new hysterical hatred?

Part Three
The wages of postmodernism, or when facts do not exist,we can invent our own reality

Who's Drafting Who?

It's the democrats who want to reinstate the draft, not the Republicans. Several democrat senators and congressmen have asked to reinstate the draft a number of times over the last year, among them, Charles Rangel and Ernest Hollings. But now they're all saying that Bush will reinstate the draft and they're spreading rumors about it.MTV's Rock the Vote has now leapt onto this mock, stupid, false, phony draft story and said, "If young Americans aren't drafted to vote they may very well be drafted to serve in Iraq," according to MTV's Rock the Vote.The senile document-forger Dan Rather is saying that there's a secret move to reinstate the draft after the election, but hey, who pays attention to that wacko? I don't think anyone does.The interesting thing is that both MTV and CBS are property of Viacom. And here's something interesting too: A president cannot order a draft. Congress has to pass legislation authorizing the draft, which the president would then have to sign.

Iraqi Leader Challenges Western Media Bias and Kerr's Words

I didn't know Dan Rather did Heroine? A mini-biography

Google censoring search results in ChinaQuery doesn't bring up news stories critical of Beijing Communists

Bush's REAL Military Record
You owe it to yourself

The Mullah's Europe: How Quickly is Europe Being Muslimized?
very, very interseting

Kerry's Precious U.N. and What Bush Actually Said There:

Victor Davis Hanson's Wall Street Journal editorialA DECAYING BODY The U.N.? Who Cares? Kofi Annan & Co. might as well move to Brussels or Geneva. BY VICTOR DAVIS HANSON Thursday, September 23, 2004 12:01 a.m. These are surreal times. Americans in Iraq are beheaded on videotape. Russian children are machine-gunned in their schools. The elderly in Israel continue to be blown apart on buses. No one--whether in Madrid, Istanbul, Riyadh, Bali, Tel Aviv or New York--is safe from the Islamic fascist, whose real enemy is modernism and Western-inspired freedom of the individual. Despite the seemingly disparate geography of these continued attacks, we are always familiar with the similar spooky signature: civilians dismembered by the suicide belt, car bomb, improvised explosive device and executioner's blade. Then follows the characteristically pathetic communiqué or loopy fatwa aired on al-Jazeera, evoking everything from the injustice of the Reconquista to some mythical grievance about Crusaders in the holy shrines. Gender equity in the radical Islamic world is now defined by the expendable female suicide bomber's slaughter of Westerners. In response to such international lawlessness, our global watchdog, the United Nations, had been largely silent. It abdicates its responsibility of ostracizing those states that harbor such mass murderers, much less organizes a multilateral posse to bring them to justice. And yet under this apparent state of siege, President Bush in his recent address to the U.N. offered not blood and iron--other than an obligatory "the proper response is not to retreat but to prevail"--but Wilsonian idealism, concrete help for the dispossessed, and candor about past sins. The president wished to convey a new multilateralist creed that would have made a John Kerry or Madeleine Albright proud, without the Churchillian "victory at any cost" rhetoric. Good luck. For years, gay-rights activists and relief workers in Africa have complained that the U.S. did not take the lead in combating the world-wide spread of AIDS. President Bush now offers to spearhead the rescue of the world's infected, with $15 billion in American help in hopes that the world's financial powers--perhaps Japan, China and the European Union--might match or trump that commitment. Nongovernmental organizations clamor about the unfairness of world trade that left the former Third World with massive debts run up by crooked dictators and complicit Western profiteers. President Bush now talks not of extending further loans to service their spiraling interest payments, but rather of outright grants to clean the slate and thus offer the impoverished a new start. International women's rights groups vie for the world's attention to stop the shameful international trafficking in women and children, whether as chattel or sexual slaves. The president now pledges to organize enforcement to stop both the smugglers and the predators on the innocent. For a half century, liberals rightly deplored the old realpolitik in the Middle East, as America and Europe supported autocratic right-wing governments on the cynical premises that they at least promised to keep pumping oil and kept out communists. Now President Bush not only renounces such past opportunism, but also confesses that "for too long, many nations, including my own, tolerated, even excused, oppression in the Middle East in the name of stability." He promises not complacency that ensures continual oppression, but radical changes that lead to freedom. The Taliban and Saddam Hussein were once the United Nations' twin embarrassments, rogue regimes that thumbed their noses at weak U.N. protestations, slaughtered their own, invaded their neighbors, and turned their outlands into terrorist sanctuaries. Now they are gone, despite either U.N. indifference or veritable opposition to their removal. The United States sought not dictators in their place, but consensual government where it had never existed. What was the response to Mr. Bush's new multifaceted vision? He was met with stony silence, followed by about seven seconds of embarrassed applause, capped off by smug sneers in the global media. Why so? First, the U.N. is not the idealistic postwar organization of our collective Unicef and Unesco nostalgia, the old perpetual force for good that we once associated with hunger relief and peacekeeping. Its membership is instead rife with tyrannies, theocracies and Stalinist regimes. Many of them, like Algeria, Cuba, Iran, Vietnam and Zimbabwe, have served on the U.N.'s 53-member Commission on Human Rights. The Libyan lunocracy--infamous for its dirty war with Chad and cash bounties to mass murderers--chaired the 2003 session. For Mr. Bush to talk to such folk about the need to spread liberty means removing from power, or indeed jailing, many of the oppressors sitting in his audience. Second, urging democratic reforms in Palestine, as Mr. Bush also outlined, is antithetical to the very stuff of the U.N., an embarrassing reminder that nearly half of its resolutions in the past half-century have been aimed at punishing tiny democratic Israel at the behest of its larger,more populous--and dictatorial--Arab neighbors. The contemporary U.N., then, has become not only hypocritical, but also a bully that hectors Israel about the West Bank while it gives a pass to a nuclear, billion-person China after swallowing Tibet; wants nothing to do with the two present dangers to world peace, a nuclear North Korea and soon to follow theocratic Iran; and idles while thousands die in the Sudan. Third, the present secretary-general, Kofi Annan, is himself a symbol of all that is wrong with the U.N. A multibillion dollar oil-for-food fraud, replete with kickbacks (perhaps involving a company that his own son worked for), grew unchecked on his watch, as a sordid array of Baathist killers, international hustlers and even terrorists milked the national petroleum treasure of Iraq while its own people went hungry. In response, Mr. Annan stonewalls, counting on exemption from the New York press on grounds of his unimpeachable liberal credentials. Meanwhile, he prefers to denigrate the toppling of Saddam Hussein as "illegal," but neither advocates reinstitution of a "legal" Saddam nor offers any concrete help to Iraqis crafting consensual society. Like the U.N. membership itself, he enjoys the freedom, affluence and security of a New York, but never stops to ask why that is so or how it might be extended to others less fortunate. Our own problems with the U.N. should now be viewed in a context of ongoing radical change here in the United States, as all the previous liberal assumptions of the past decades undergo scrutiny in our post 9/11 world. There are no longer any sacred cows in the eyes of the American public. Ask Germany and South Korea as American troops depart, Saudi Arabia where bases are closed, and the once beaming Yasser Arafat, erstwhile denizen of the Lincoln Bedroom, as he now broods in his solitary rubble bunker. Deeds, not rhetoric, are all that matter, as the once unthinkable is now the possible. There is no intrinsic reason why the U.N. should be based in New York rather than in its more logical utopian home in Brussels or Geneva. There is no law chiseled in stone that says any fascist or dictatorial state deserves authorized membership by virtue of its hijacking of a government. There is no logic to why a France is on the Security Council, but a Japan or India is not. And there is no reason why a group of democratic nations, unapologetic about their values and resolute to protect freedom, cannot act collectively for the common good, entirely indifferent to Syria's censure or a Chinese veto. So Americans' once gushy support for the U.N. during its adolescence is gone. By the 1970s we accepted at best that it had devolved into a neutral organization in its approach to the West, and by the 1980s sighed that it was now unabashedly hostile to freedom. But in our odyssey from encouragement, to skepticism, and then to hostility, we have now reached the final stage--of indifference. Americans do not get riled easily, so the U.N. will go out with a whimper rather than a bang. Indeed, millions have already shrugged, tuned out, and turned the channel on it. Mr. Hanson, a military historian, is a senior fellow at Stanford's Hoover Institution.

Michael Moore admits Kerry is a bad candidate! Oh.......My...........GAWD!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If I hear one more person tell me how lousy a candidate Kerry is and how he can't win... Dammit, of COURSE he's a lousy candidate -- he's a Democrat, for heavens sake! That party is so pathetic, they even lose the elections they win! What were you expecting, Bruce Springsteen heading up the ticket? Bruce would make a helluva president, but guys like him don't run -- and neither do you or I. People like Kerry run.

Chirac: Time
for global tax
French president supports plan
to fight international poverty

So if the U.S. signed on, could we cease all other foreign aid in that regard? We would save hundreds of millions!

A Fitting Analogy of the Future of Our Children If Kerry Were President:

Kerry campaign donors apparently come in all sizes. He told Philbin and Ripa that a woman in New York gave him $385 that her 8-year-old son had raised selling homemade campaign buttons, and a 6-year-old in Philadelphia handed over a plastic container with $685 he had earned selling homemade campaign bracelets.

Tax 'em early John.

Donald Trump Answer's Reporter Question: 'Yes I Would Fire Dan Rather' LOL I gotta respect his business sense!

Political Affiliations of Viacom Board Could Impact CBS Case

BY JOSH GERSTEIN - Staff Reporter of the Sun
September 21, 2004

Experts in corporate governance say the directors of CBS's parent company, Viacom, are obliged to assume some role in resolving the fiasco over CBS News's use of what appear to be fake documents about President Bush's military record.

The political affiliations of Viacom's board and senior management, however, could undercut the credibility of any action the board may take.

Viacom's chairman and chief executive, Sumner Redstone, is a self-described "liberal Democrat" and a prolific donor to Democratic campaigns. Of the company's 13 board members, eight contribute primarily to Democratic candidates and party committees. Two other members of the board, Joseph Califano and William Cohen, held cabinet posts under Democratic presidents.

"The board needs to be involved, so to speak, prophylactically," a business ethics specialist at the Conference Board, Ronald Berenbeim, said.

As Rather goes, so goes network news

James P. Pinkerton

September 21, 2004

These are the final days for Dan Rather. But the story of the fake documents aired on "60 Minutes" is deeper than just one man's fall. It is the story of technology's transition-and that's a tale that will never end.

By any fair reckoning, Rather should resign. As a big shot at CBS News-in addition to being anchorman-in-chief, he has been the managing editor of the CBS Evening News since March 1981-he deserves to be held to the same standard as Howell Raines, the executive editor of The New York Times, who was forced to resign last year in the wake of a news-fabrication scandal.

Some might argue that Rather was just a duped news reader, that he was simply following orders. In which case, following the precedent established in the 1998 "Tailwind" scandal-in which CNN's Peter Arnett was forced to quit after he read phony copy about Americans using poison gas in Laos-Rather should still be forced to take his leave.

Future First Lady? 

Saint Bubba!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 

Christian Persecution at the hands of Hindu's!

Stolen Honor a new film expose on Kerry's ant-war activities after he returned from his four month presidential traing in Viet Nam debut's today.

Kerry's Power Of Pursuasion?
Today's top story is by Bill Gertz in the Washington Times, which begins a three-part series on the French connection. Gertz writes:
New intelligence revealing how long France continued to supply and arm Saddam Hussein's regime infuriated U.S. officials as the nation prepared for military action against Iraq.
The intelligence reports showing French assistance to Saddam ongoing in the late winter of 2002 helped explain why France refused to deal harshly with Iraq and blocked U.S. moves at the United Nations. "No wonder the French are opposing us," one U.S. intelligence official remarked after illegal sales to Iraq of military and dual-use parts, originating in France, were discovered early last year before the war began.
French aid to Iraq goes back decades and includes transfers of advanced conventional arms and components for weapons of mass destruction. The central figure in these weapons ties is French President Jacques Chirac. His relationship with Saddam dates to 1975, when, as prime minister, the French politician rolled out the red carpet when the Iraqi strongman visited Paris.
Gertz's report cites chapter and verse. You should read it all; here is just a brief excerpt:
On April 8 came the downing of Air Force Maj. Jim Ewald's A-10 Thunderbolt fighter over Baghdad and the discovery that it was a French-made Roland missile that brought down the American pilot and destroyed a $13 million aircraft. Ewald, one of the first U.S. pilots shot down in the war, was rescued by members of the Army's 54th Engineer Battalion who saw him parachute to earth not far from the wreckage.
Army intelligence concluded that the French had sold the missile to the Iraqis within the past year, despite French denials.
A week after Ewald's A-10 was downed, an Army team searching Iraqi weapons depots at the Baghdad airport discovered caches of French-made missiles. One anti-aircraft missile, among a cache of 51 Roland-2s from a French-German manufacturing partnership, bore a label indicating that the batch was produced just months earlier.In May, Army intelligence found a stack of blank French passports in an Iraqi ministry, confirming what U.S. intelligence already had determined: The French had helped Iraqi war criminals escape from coalition forces — and therefore justice.
All of this would have been different, of course, if John Kerry, with his superior charm, had occupied the White House.

Not only do Dan Blather and CBS listen to the DNC marching orders:

Today show devotes 3 days to phony book. Three more next week.
Katie Coulic didn't bother to devote ONE MOMENT to Swift boat Vetern's.

The old media liberals were so excited. Reports had again surfaced of George Bush’s alleged cocaine use, and Kitty Kelly reportedly has them in her latest book “The Family: The Real Story of the Bush Dynasty.”
Not so fast. While Kelly has already become the darling of the Bush-hating crowd and is scheduled for a full three appearances in three days on NBC’s Today show next week, her allegations are already falling apart.

Ben Barnes, a Democrat politician himself seems to be fishing for a job in the Kerry administration while simultaneously having a book deal coming out soon.

Meanwhile, Killian's widow and son also have questioned the memos' authenticity.
Marjorie Connell told the Washington Post she was "livid" at CBS and described the records as "a farce."
Connell said her husband did not keep files and considered Bush "an excellent pilot."
"I don't think there were any documents," she said. "He was not a paper person."
A CBS reporter contacted her briefly before Wednesday night's broadcasts, she said, but did not ask her to authenticate the records, according to the Post.
Gary Killian, who served in the Guard with his father, said a memo signed by his father appeared legitimate but he doubted his father wrote another that referred to the performance review.
"I am upset because I think it is a mixture of truth and fiction here," Killian told the AP.
The wire service said another officer who served with Killian and a document expert also said the documents appear to be forgeries.
Internet origins
The White House distributed copies of the memos, apparently dampening speculation they are fraudulent. But the copies are from faxes sent by CBS News yesterday.
Major news outlets such as ABC News and the Washington Post now are advancing the story, but it came to life through the scrutiny of weblogs such as Powerline and Little Green Footballs.
National Review's "Kerry Spot" weblog cited Bruce Webster, an expert witness in U.S. District Court cases on computer document forensics, who said the memo posted online by CBS News "has all sorts of problems" and points out the "typefaces weren't available on typewriters in 1973."
A Powerline reader said the document appears to use the superscript 'th,' but there "are no keys on any typewriter in common use in 1973 which could produce a tiny "th." The forger got careless after creating the August 1, 1972 document and slipped up big-time."
A number of Web contributors said they could create an exact representation of the document using Microsoft Word.
The author of Little Green Footballs wrote: "I opened Microsoft Word, set the font to Microsoft's Times New Roman, tabbed over to the default tab stop to enter the date '18 August 1973,' then typed the rest of the document purportedly from the personal records of the late Lieutenant Colonel Jerry B. Killian. And my Microsoft Word version, typed in 2004, is an exact match for the documents trumpeted by CBS News as 'authentic.'"
Others pointed out the memo did not have letterhead and the paper size should be 8x10.5 rather than 8.5x11.
According to the weblog INDC Journal, Dr. Philip Bouffard, touted as one of the top two experts in forensic document examination of typefaces in the country, said he cannot make a 100-percent-positive evaluation because the documents appear to have been copied several times.
But he stated, "It's just possible that this might be a Times Roman font, which means that it would have been created on a computer. It's very possible that someone decided to create this document on a computer ... . I've run across this situation before ... my gut is this could just well be a fabrication."
Bouffard noted the document has "proportional spacing," which was on only seven or eight models not widely available in 1972-73.
He also pointed out the number 4 does not have a "foot" and has a "closed top," which is indicative of Times New Roman, a font exclusive to modern computer word processing programs.
Bouffard told INDC Journal that after further analysis, he's fairly certain the Aug. 18, 1973, document is a fake.
He noted, examining his old papers, the inconsistency of the "4" coming up several previous times with forgeries that attempt to duplicate old proportional spaced documents with a computer word processor.
He said he didn't know who CBS contacted to verify the document's authenticity, but is aware of only one person aside from himself who might be more qualified to determine authentic typefaces.
'Previously unseen'
"60 Minutes II" reported last night it had "previously unseen documents" from Killian's personal office file.
In a memo dated May 1972, Killian writes that Lt. Bush called him to talk about "how he can get out of coming to drill from now through November."
The docment says Lt. Bush told his commander "he is working on a campaign in Alabama ... and may not have time to take his physical." Killian adds that he thinks Bush has gone over his head, and is "talking to someone upstairs."
One of the Killian memos is an official order to Bush to report for a physical, which never was carried out.
CBS says, in an Aug. 1, 1972, memo Killian wrote, "On this date I ordered that 1st Lt. Bush be suspended from flight status due to failure to perform to USAF/TexANG standards and failure to meet annual physical examination ... as ordered."
A memo from Aug. 18, 1973, according to CBS, has Killian saying Col. Buck Staudt, head of the Texas Air National Guard, is putting on pressure to "sugar coat" the evaluation of Lt. Bush.
The memo continues, with Killian saying, "I'm having trouble running interference and doing my job."
CBS News said Staudt, a Bush family supporter, would not agree to an interview request.
Bush spokesman Dan Bartlett responded to CBS's request for comment about Killian's statements in the memos.
"For anybody to try to interpret or presume they know what somebody who is now dead was thinking in any of these memos, I think is very difficult to do," he said.
Bartlett added that Bush's superiors granted permission to train in Alabama in a non-flying status and that "many of the documents you have here affirm just that."
CBS News noted that earlier in his flying career, Bush received glowing evaluations from Killian, who called him an "exceptionally fine young officer and pilot" who "performed in an outstanding manner."
According to military documents released this week, Bush scored 88 on an airmanship test, 98 on aviation physiology and 100 on navigational abilities.

False Documentation?
CBS used forged documents to "prove case"?
Nooo! Say it ain't so. The media isn't biased!

Democratic Party chairman Terry McAuliffe said, "George W. Bush's cover story on his National Guard service is rapidly unraveling. ... George W. Bush needs to answer why he regularly misled the American people about his time in the Guard and who applied political pressure on his behalf to have his performance reviews 'sugarcoated'" oops, there's a little egg on your face Terry.
White House communications director Dan Bartlett said Bush did not take the physical because he was not going to be in a flying capacity in Alabama. "Those who are trying to read the mind of a person dead 20 years are stretching at best. The president at every turn did what he was told to do."

Check the superscript error on one of the documents that has the 111th with smaller font for the "th" above and to the right of the 111. The whole document was done in Microsoft Word. If you retype it in Word, print it and lay it on top of the document, the whole thing is a perfect fit. Superscripts and changes in font were not a part of typewriters and Microsoft Word had not been invented yet, not to mention that no one had a PC back then. Bozo's Linked to Kerry!

WE will never forget!!! Bush/Cheney '04

The same person that the National Communist Party will vote for. "I will be a good president because I was wounded in Viet Nam. You can't point out where I am wrong in this because I have Purple Hearts!

Who would Al Qaeda vote for?

Here's a little reminder