NYT: Modest Lefty Pittsburgh Protest Comparable to Huge Conservative Protest in D.C.
It's SO funny how liberals and conservatives are like night and day. For conservaitves: no violence nor even any litter at the end. But for lib's violence, vandalism, vitriol, mayhem. yet the way their media reports it, you'd think it were the other way around.
'Speaker now likening genuine opposition to assassination'...
Associate Attorney General Thomas J. Perrelli, the No. 3 official in the Obama Justice Department, was consulted and ultimately approved a decision in May to reverse course and drop a civil complaint accusing three members of the New Black Panther Party of intimidating voters in Philadelphia during November's election, according to interviews.
Dan Rather wants Obama to help save the news...
Stimulus Billions Disappear in States Without Oversight
Organic food 'no healthier'...
How about all the floundering newspapers? They could use federal aid too!
Government owned newspapers...hmmm. That fits into the Masterplan very well.
Budget deficit tops $1 trillion for first time...
How long to get to the second?
FACT CHECK: Don't quote Sotomayor on that, Senator... Leahy creative rewriting of history...
FAIR: Obama Betrays Security for Illegal Amnesty
Sooner or later, liberals will learn to not provoke Liz Cheney on issues of national security.
Those who watch the news for information other than the tragic death (and subsequent funeral circus) of Michael Jackson have most likely heard of the most recent round of accusations made by congressional liberals against the Central Intelligence Agency. On the July 14 “Morning Joe,” the former vice president's daughter issued a thrashing of Washington Post columnist Eugene Robinson, who (one would guess) did not adequately prepare to argue about the laws concerning when the CIA is required to brief Congress.
Robinson first submits the following:
EUGENE ROBINSON, Washington Post columnist: Hi, Liz, how are you? I have a question. I actually have a question for Liz in a minute, but you know, look, it's inconvenient that there is a law, there is a 1947 law that requires that Congress be briefed on significant intelligence operations or activities or anticipated significant intelligent activity, so it seems to be clear that they should have been briefed. And if the Vice President told the CIA not to brief Congress then that was wrong.
That certainly sounds correct, at least on the surface – if that’s the law, that’s the law.
Except, that’s not the law: (more)
Franken: 'The most experienced Supreme Court nominee in 100 years'...
Obama trips up over Russian leadership order; 'President Putin'...
"PEDOPHILE PROTECTION ACT" WILL SNEAK INTO SENATE AMENDMENT
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), added the "Matthew Shepard Hate Crimes Prevention Act,” (which is better known to conservatives as the "Pedophile Protection Act,") to his short-term legislative list Monday, by saying he was "committed" to a Senate vote on hate crimes legislation before the August recess. The pro-homosexual newspaperWashington Blade reported the vote could happen as early as today (Wednesday), but staffers at Senator Kennedy's office denied that claim, giving us a few more days to act.
The pro-homosexual, anti-faith bill, sponsored by Senator Ted Kennedy (D-MA) and pushed hard by the Obama Administration, was until recently labeled S. 909 "Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act." But it faced such strong resistance by conservatives (including threat of filibuster or faith-protecting amendments by pro-faith Senator Jim DeMint, R-SC), so instead Democrats have announced they will soon hide the bill as an amendment to another "must-move" bill, denying committee hearings, and completely side-stepping the Republicans right to debate and amend.
547 SEXUAL DEVIANCES TO BE PROTECTED BY FEDERAL MARSHALS
The forthcoming "poison pill" amendment will mirror a House bill H.R. 1913, already passed 249-175 along strict party lines, which makes "sexual orientation," "gender," and "gender identity" into federally-protected classes under the law, and codifies federal protection of up to 547 types of sexually deviant behaviors, including:
* Incest – sex with one’s offspring (a crime, of course)
* Necrophilia – sexual relations with a corpse, also a crime
* Pedophilia – sex with an underage child, another crime
* Zoophilia – bestiality, a crime in numerous states
* Voyeurism – a criminal offense in most states
* Fronteurism – a man rubbing against an unknown woman’s buttocks
* Coprophilia – sexual arousal from feces
* Urophilia – sexual arousal from urine
Attempts by House Republicans to add amendments stating "pedophilia is not protected as a sexual orientation" were specifically blocked and defeated by House Democrats. Lesbian Congresswoman Tammy Baldwin (D-WI) expressed opposition to excluding pedophiles from the bill, and Democrats voted with her to strike any child-protection amendment. She claimed that pedophiles would not be defined within “sexual orientation,” but wouldn't put that in writing, and refused to define that phrase "sexual orientation," which according to the American Psychiatric Association includes all 547 sexual deviances listed in their DSM-III manual of clinical psychoses, including pedophilia, so now thanks to most Democrats, child molesters will be protected by federal law.
James von Brunn, the man who allegedly shot and killed a guard at the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., was a Darwin-lover who hated the Bible and Christians, and defies media efforts to classify him as a stereotypical "right-winger," according to reports. The Moonbattery blog revealed von Brunn advocated the socialist policies espoused by Adolf Hitler and used Darwinian theory to support his anti-Semitism. The AMA has been playing nice with our Democrat rulers, in hopes of getting a raise in doctors' Medicare fees. But it's not going to take the impending catastrophe of nationalized healthcare lying down: Having learned a lesson from the HillaryCare debacle, Dems are trying to push through nationalization before resistance can be organized. The AMA is speaking up none too soon.Darwin-loving museum shooter hates Bible, Christians
Suspect in death of security guard defies easy stereotypingAMA Denounces ObamaCare
As the health care debate heats up, the American Medical Association is letting Congress know that it will oppose creation of a government-sponsored insurance plan, which President Obama and many other Democrats see as an essential element of legislation to remake the health care system. …
While committed to the goal of affordable health insurance for all, the association had said in a general statement of principles that health services should be "provided through private markets, as they are currently." …
[I]n comments submitted to the Senate Finance Committee, the American Medical Association said: "The A.M.A. does not believe that creating a public health insurance option for non-disabled individuals under age 65 is the best way to expand health insurance coverage and lower costs. The introduction of a new public plan threatens to restrict patient choice by driving out private insurers, which currently provide coverage for nearly 70 percent of Americans."
If private insurers are pushed out of the market, the group said, "the corresponding surge in public plan participation would likely lead to an explosion of costs that would need to be absorbed by taxpayers."
Intollerant pageant officials unjustly fire Miss California anyway. Claim breach of contract where there was none. Christian persecucation even in a state that agreed with her statement!
Posts
All Comments
